Welcome to South West (UK) Linux User Group
 
  Signup / Login Home  ·  Web Links  ·  Reviews  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top List  ·   
 Main Menu
· Home
· Reviews
· Meeting Info
· Mailing List Archive
· FAQ
· Topics
· Web Links
· Get Linux!
· Special Offers/Discounts
· Our Sponsors

· Linux@Home
· Linux@Business
· Linux@School

  

 Please support:
No ePatents!

 A proud member of:
UK Linux User Groups

AOL Time Warner joins the queue
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, January 22, 2002 - 09:46 PM
Microsoft Anonymous writes "That's the queue of people lining up to sue Microsoft, this time over anti-competitive practices affecting Netscape (and other competing browsers).
AOL, which now owns Netscape, wants Microsoft to cease its contested business practices and pay damages.
The company also asked for an immediate injunction against “ongoing and further damage” involving Netscape’s browser, AOL executive John Buckley said. Many of Microsoft’s business practices, including ones in which the company encouraged computer manufacturers and Internet providers to distribute its Web browser instead of Netscape, were found to be anticompetitive by a federal appeals court last year. AOL, which now owns Netscape, wants Microsoft to cease its contested business practices and pay damages.

AOL executive John Buckley noted the court ruling and said, “This action is an attempt to get justice in this matter.”

AOL filed the lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. Under federal law, AOL would be entitled to triple any actual damages found by the court.

One possible option, if a judge rules in favor of AOL, would be to force Microsoft to sell a stripped-down version of its Windows operating system so computer manufacturers could choose which Internet browser to offer. That has also been requested by nine state attorneys general suing Microsoft in federal court.

U.S. District Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson, who heard the federal government’s case against Microsoft in the Netscape matter, found that Microsoft tried to keep consumers from being able to choose Netscape.

“All of Microsoft’s agreements, including the non-exclusive ones, severely restricted Netscape’s access,” Jackson wrote.

University of Baltimore law professor Bob Lande said of AOL and its lawsuit: “This is a company that obviously can afford it, and wouldn’t take the step lightly.”

“I think they’ve got an excellent chance of success given that the government has established the facts and established that Microsoft has broken the law,” he said.

A judge would still have the challenge of choosing a remedy that would restore competition to the Internet browser market. Netscape has only a sliver of the Internet browser market, compared to its dominance several years ago.

“You can’t literally put the market back in the competitive position it was in, so you’d have to think of a forward-looking remedy to help restore competition in the market as best as possible,” Lande said.

The federal government and nine other states settled their landmark antitrust suit with Microsoft last year, and that settlement is under consideration by a federal judge. AOL has been a longtime critic of Microsoft and has talked frequently with prosecutors throughout the case.

Story taken from the Washington Post.
The original story is here."

 
 Related links
· More about Microsoft
· News by Anonymous




AOL Time Warner joins the queue | Login/Create an account | 0 Comments
Threshold
Comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.
Home  ·  Web Links  ·  Reviews  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top List  · 

Web site powered by PostNuke Redhat LinuxApache Web Server

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters.
Site and most content created and maintained by David Johnson.
Theme by Dezina.com.